46th
World Table
Tennis ChampionshipsOsaka, Japan · April 23 - May 6, 2001
By Larry Hodges
After his two losses
against South Korea in the semifinals, some thought that Kong Linghui might sit
out the final, especially since Wang Liqin, ranked #1 in the world, hadn’t
played the semifinals. Instead, China moved Kong to the third position, where he
would only play one match, and moved Ma Lin from the third to the second
position, where he would play matches one and five (if it went that far). Liu
Guozheng, the hero of the semifinals for China (where he had fought off seven
match and tie points) filled out the roster, in the #1 slot, playing matches two
and four. The three Chinese, Kong Linghui, Ma Lin and Liu Guozheng, are ranked
#2, 3 and 5 in the world. On the bench for them would be Wang Liqin (#1) and Liu
Guoliang (co-#5). That’s luxury, having the world #1 and the World &
Olympic Men’s Singles Champion (Liu Guoliang) on the bench!
Up against them
would be the underdog Belgium team, whose changes of winning might have been
thought of as roughly proportional to the two country’s relative sizes or
population – pretty low. The same was said of South Korea the day before –
and of Belgium before they played Sweden.
For the final,
Belgium is playing the same three in the same order as the day before –
Jean-Michel Saive, his brother Philippe Saive, and Martin Bratanov. The three
Belgians are ranked #12, 47 and 105 in the world (with Andras Podpinka and Marc
Closset, world #67 and 223, on the bench). If these numbers were accurate, they
wouldn’t be in the final.
Some historical
perspective: China and Belgium have played at the Worlds six times throughout
history, in 1957, 1959 (before any of these players were born), 1989, 1993, 1995
and 2000. In 1989 (when 21-year-olds Ma Lin and Liu Guozheng were nine years
old), China won 5-2. Other than that, it’s been a skunk, China 24-2.
Ma Lin (CHN) vs.
Jean-Michel Saive (BEL)
Since the 1997
Worlds, these two have played five times, with Ma winning four times. The last
time they played was 17 months ago in November of 1999, when they played twice
in the European Club League, with Saive winning the first time 2-1, but losing
the second, 2-0. A lot can change in 17 months – since then, Ma Lin made the
final of Men’s Singles at the Worlds, losing to teammate Liu Guoliang in the
final, deuce in the fifth, while Saive’s formerly “weak” backhand, based
on yesterday’s performance (defeating Jorgen Persson) is no longer weak.
Generally, Saive is an all-out forehand looper and lobber/fisher. If he’s not
looping forehands, he’s usually back at the barriers defending. Ma Lin would
be a classic penhold looper except he also has an exceptional back-of-the-racket
penhold backhand loop.
In the first game,
they battle to 16-all – and then Saive took over. He serve and ripped two
identical forehand loops to Ma’s wide forehand for winners, and then won a
longer point where Ma was forced off the table, topspin defending
(“fishing”) until Saive ripped a winner.
The second was all
Ma Lin, ripping at will, 21-7.
In the third, at
13-all, Saive scores two in a row to lead 15-13. Ma calls a one-minute time-out
to talk to his coach. What did the coach say? We may never know, but
whatever it was, Ma came back to the table – and scored eight straight points
to win the game and match, -17,7,15. Saive may never know as well, but he’ll
be thinking about the four opening loops against push he missed (three of them
backhand loops), in those last eight points (along with one unlucky net ball).
Liu Guozheng (CHN)
vs. Philippe Saive (BEL)
Both of these
players are known for being hot/cold players. Liu, however, is such a strong
player that even when he’s not hot, he’s very strong. To have a chance,
Saive will have to be hot. They have played once before – with Liu winning in
five at the 2000 Olympics.
He is - Saive jumps
out to a 7-3 and 10-5 lead. But Liu
ties it up at 14-all. From there on, Liu gradually pulls away, 16-14, 20-16,
21-18. (At 20-17, Liu tries to rip a counterloop, but so grazes the ball that it
basically drops to the floor, spinning.)
In the second, Saive
again jumps to a 7-3 lead – but Liu catches him quickly, 9-9. Then it’s
10-all, 11-all, 12-all, 13-all, 14-all. This is where Liu pulled away the
previous game, and that’s what he does here. Down 14-17, Saive calls a
time-out. When he returns, he
serves long, and Liu loop kills a winner, 14-18. Saive serves long again, and
Liu misses a loop kill, 15-18. Saive serves long still again, and Liu again loop
kills it, 15-19. Saive finally serves short, and follows with a flip
kill, 16-19. But it’s too late – Liu wins a counterlooping exhange to go up
20-16. When Liu, who’s been winning all the points and is obviously hot,
misses a loop next rally (20-17), the Chinese coach surprisingly calls a
timeout. Perhaps he wants to tell him what serves to use? Liu serves long, Saive
loops, Liu blocks, and Saive misses a loop. (Was it choreographed by the Chinese
coach?). Match to Liu, 18 & 17, and China leads 2-0.
Kong Linghui (CHN)
vs. Martin Bratanov (BEL)
Yesterday morning,
most players would have looked at this and said, “Martin who?” By last
night, Bratanov had won his match in the semifinals, while Kong had lost both of
his. Now they were meeting at the final of the World Teams, the #2 (and former
#1 and 1995 World Men’s Singles Champion) player in the world versus the #105
player in the world.
A mismatch? It
started that way, with Kong going up 5-0. But in the seesaw way that that every
match had been recently, Bratanov tied it at 11-all. Then 12-all, 13-all and
14-all. What is it about 14-all? In both games against Philippe Saive, Liu
Guozheng had pulled away at that score. Now Bratanov makes his move here,
pulling off a diving block from his forehand to Kong’s open forehand court to
lead 15-13. But Kong wins the next five, and soon leads 20-16. Bratanov serve
and loops a winner, 20-17. Kong backhand hits a serve off, 20-18. Bratanov then
serve and rips a “winner” to Kong’s forehand – but Kong quick hits a
winner to Bratanov’s open forehand court, 21-18.
Kong starts game two fast, leading 4-1 on Bratanov’s serve. Bratanov, with his big free-swinging loops, stays close, and ties it at 14-all – only to lose the next two (that 14-all jinx…). Bratanov scores the next three, and leads 17-16. Then (seesawing again) Kong scores three in a row to lead 19-16. When Bratanov backhand killed Kong’s loop the next point (19-18), the Chinese coach called a timeout. (The Chinese coach really seemed to have a different theory about timeouts – while others called them after losing a few points near the end of an important game, he often called them near the end of a game when his player had scored a number in a row, and then lost just one.) Kong then went up 20-18, but Bratanov kill loops Kong’s next serve, 20-19. When Kong against serves long, Bratanov loops again – off! Kong and China have won, 18 & 19.
Going into these
Worlds, China was the dominant men’s power, with the #1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 men in
the world. Going out, they are still the dominant power and the world champions.
But nobody who was here and saw their opponents battle their hearts out against
them – especially South Korea in the semifinals - will ever again think that
even the most dominant country is a sure thing.
China d. Belgium 3-0
Ma Lin (CHN) d. Jean-Michel Saive (BEL), -17,7,15
Liu
Guozheng (CHN) d. Philippe Saive (BEL), 18,17
Kong
Linghui (CHN) d. Martin Bratanov (BEL), 18,19
| |
| USA Table Tennis - Serving the Table Tennis Community |
| |