![]() Ping-Pong.com/STIGA - USA National Team Sponsor |
2001 U.S. Team Trials
By Larry Hodges

Left:
David Zhuang, copyright 2001 by Larry Hodges; Right: Cheng Yinghua copyright
2001 by Kaus Photography.
If there were only three spots on the USA Men’s Team, it
would have been a relatively boring Trials, as three players ran away from the
final field of eight. Early on, Cheng Yinghua was so dominating, giving up so
few points per game, that he looked unstoppable. He was finally stopped, but not
enough to stop him from coming in first, edging out David Zhuang (second) and
Eric Owens in a three-way tie for first.
Let’s go over this three-way battle first, and then
we’ll get to the battle for the fourth spot.
Early on, Cheng played Eric … and there was no indication
of the dogfight to come. Cheng won easily, 6, 7, 6, 2.
However, in the best-played match of the Trials, the top
two seeds – Cheng and David – faced off. Why were they playing early on,
rather than playing last, as the top two seeds usually do? “I’m glad you
asked,” said Trials Referee Wendell Dillon. It turns out that when there is a
Trials for a team, the most important match is considered the match between the
weakest player seeded to make the team, and the strongest seeded not to make it.
So the matches between the fourth and fifth seeds (seeding based on results from
the Qualifier round) are saved for last … except in this case, the fourth and
fifth seeds, Ashu Jain and Razvan Cretu, have already played. But they rightly
still go with the schedule, other than this match. With regard to making the
team, this match is not important. However, with prize money for the team
finishers at 1st $2750, 2nd $2000, 3rd $1500
and 4th $1250, it’s a $750 match (difference between first and
second), right?
Eric
Owens. Copyright 2001 by Kaus Photography.
David starts off strong, Cheng weak, and after two games,
it’s not a very good match. 4 and 5 for David.
But then Cheng comes alive, winning the third 11-3, and pulling out the
fourth a14-12. David wins the fifth, 11-7
Cheng is looping over and over from both sides, and
absolutely creaming forehand loops every few shots. David is controlling play
with his steady blocking and sudden smashes. When David pushes Cheng off the
table, or starts hitting, he’s in control; when Cheng starts looping strong,
he’s in control.
Cheng goes up 8-4 in the sixth … and then loses 6 in a
row! David has match point at 10-8, but Cheng won’t let go. He rips a backhand
loop, and absolutely pulverizes the block return, 10-9. When David smashes into
the net, it’s 10-all. 11-10 Cheng. 11-11. 12-11 Cheng. Cheng wins it with a down-the-line backhand loop, and we’re
into the seventh.
David runs away with it – 5-0, 7-2, 9-5. Then Cheng ties
it 9-all with a series of all-out powerloops – he’s thrown control to the
winds, but he’s making them all. Then Cheng rips two forehand loops, David
blocks them, and Cheng misses a running backhand loop. When David loops his
serve, and Cheng blocks in the net, David has held on to win, 11-9 in the
seventh.
Adam
Hugh. Copyright 2001 by Larry Hodges.
But will David come in first? He plays Eric Owens next –
and Eric wins the first two at 9 & 8, with a relentless forehand looping
blitz attack. This is Eric at his fastest and most powerful. David wins the next
two, both at 7. Eric wins the fifth, 11-9, but loses the sixth … 11-1! But the
momentum switches in the seventh, as Eric goes up 7-1. Then it’s 7-3, then
10-4 match point. A moment later, it’s 10-8, and Eric has called a time-out.
After the break, Eric serves, rips a forehand winner, and the match is over.
In the three-way tie between the three (assuming all three
win their final round matches – all three have long since clinched spots on
the team, and are only playing for position and prize money), Cheng has defeated
Eric 4-0, while losing to David 3-4, and so is 7-4. David defeated Cheng 4-3,
lost to Eric 3-4, and so is 7-7. Eric defeated David 4-3, but lost to Cheng 0-4,
and so is 4-7. It’s 1st Cheng, 2nd David, 3rd
Eric.
Or is it?
In the final round, David plays Razvan Cretu, Eric plays
Ashu Jain, and Cheng plays Sean Lonergan. And we haven’t gotten to the story
of the fourth spot yet.
13-year-old Adam Hugh won games off Lonergan, O’Neill and
a playful Cheng, but finishes 0-7. He’s out of the running, and finishes
eighth. But who would have expected him in the final eight?
Sean
O'Neill. Copyright 2001 by Kaus Photography.
5-time U.S. Men’s Champion Sean O’Neill is no longer in
his past playing shape, and lost his first five matches before winning his last
two against Ashu Jain and Adam. He finished seventh at 2-5 … but his 4-3 win
over Ashu, in the sixth round, set up the nail-biting finish in the battle for
the fourth spot.
Sean
Lonergan. Copyright 2001 by Kaus Photography.
After taking a year off after the 2000 Olympic Trials, Sean
Lonergan is back, and playing pretty well … but not quite well enough. Losses
to rivals Ashu Jain and Razvan Cretu knocked him out. Yet … if he’d beaten
Ashu 4-2 or better (or 4-3, and win on points in a three-way tie), he’d have
made the team. Coming in, he had a very strong record against Ashu, but this
time he lost 4-1. Lonergan finished sixth at 2-5, finishing ahead of O’Neill
by winning head-to-head, 4-0.
Which brings us to Ashu Jain and Razvan Cretu. Ashu had his
carry-over 4-3 win over Razvan from the qualifier, so all he has to do is match
Razvan, and he wins head-to-head. Only Lonergan can force a three-way tie, and
Ashu beat him head-to-head as well, so he’d win any three-way tie. (And, to
get into this three-way tie, Lonergan would have to beat Cheng in the final
round – which Cheng wasn’t likely to allow easily, since it would drop him
to third place, $1500 instead of $2750.)
Razvan
Cretu. Copyright 2001 by Larry Hodges.
After Ashu loses to O’Neill in round six, and Razvan
comes from behind to beat Lonergan (-15, -5, 12, 10, -7, 1, 4), Razvan and Ashu
are tied at 3-3, but with Ashu’s head-to-head win looming large. For Razvan to
make the team, he’d have to beat David Zhuang in the final round, while Ashu
would have to lose to Eric Owens. It won’t be easy – not only does he have
to find a way to get through the great wall of Zhuang – something that few can
do – but he’s having shoulder problems, taking an injury break after the
fifth game against Lonergan, and getting shoulder massages between nearly every
game he plays.
Eric quickly won against Ashu, 5, 8, 8, 8, and so all Ashu
could do is watch to see what Razvan was doing with David.
Or more closely, what was Razvan doing to the “favored”
David? Razvan played Goliath, and went up 3-0, at 7, 5, 7. Both David and Ashu
are from the New Jersey TTC; would David let down his club-mate?
Ashu
Jain ... Relieved! Copyright 2001 by Larry Hodges.
Enough melodrama. The rest of the way simply wasn’t close, with David winning all four, 5, 4, 5, 5. What a comeback! And Razvan – so close, four chances! But the team is set. Ashu and Razvan are tied at 3-4, but Ashu wins, head-to-head. The final order, with the top four making the USA Team:
| 1. | Cheng Yinghua | 6-1 |
| 2. | David Zhuang | 6-1 |
| 3. | Eric Owens | 6-1 |
| 4. | Ashu Jain | 3-4 |
| 5. | Razvan Cretu | 3-4 |
| 6. | Sean Lonergan | 2-5 |
| 7. | Sean O’Neill | 2-5 |
| 8. | Adam Hugh | 0-7 |
Frank
Chang and wife Chang Jun Gao. Copyright 2001 by Larry Hodges.
As expected, Chang Jun Gao won all five of her matches. In
fact, only sixth seed Simone Yang was able to get a game against her, as Gao
finished 5-0, with a 20-1 game record.
Tawny
Banh. Copyright 2001 by Larry Hodges.
Also as expected, Tawny Banh and Jasna Reed battled for the
second and third spots. Tawny’s carry-over win from the qualification round
– where she’d won a 4-3 battle (see previous day’s write-up) – was the
turning factor. Tawny lost to Lily Yip in what might have been the most
bang-bang match of the tournament between these two ultra-quick at the table
players, but that only dropped her into a tie with Jasna, with both at 3-2.
Tawny won head-to-head, and so came in second, Jasna third.
Tawny almost fell out of that tie in a long battle with
chopper Virginia Sung. She just missed going seven, winning 3, 10, -7, 5, -4,
10. Jasna also had to work against Virginia, but was helped by a lob on the edge
to win the first, 16-14, on her way to a 14, 7, -9, 8, 8 win.
Simone
Yang. Copyright 2001 by Kaus Photography.
With the top three spots taken, there was a battle for the
fourth and final spot by Virginia, Lily and Simone Yang. Simone is one of those
players that never seems to do much, often just pushing and blocking, sometimes
picking out a shot, but nothing flashy. Yet, in a long, patient battle with
Virginia, she finally prevailed 11-9 in the seventh in the loooongest match of
the Trials, 9, -8, -10, 4, 7, -9, 9. That’s close!
Against the complete opposite style, the pips-out penholder
hitting & blocking Lily, Simone also had to battle, but won in efficient
fashion, -7, 8, 4, 8, 9. With those two wins, Simone clinched the fourth spot on
the Team at 2-3 – taking the last spot on the team, just as she had done at
the World Team Trials earlier this year.
Virginia came in fifth with a 6, -9, 7, 10, 4 over Lily. She and Lily both finished 1-4, with Virginia winning head-to-head. The final order, with the top four making the USA Team:
| 1. | Chang Jun Gao | 5-0 |
| 2. | Tawny Banh | 3-2 |
| 3. | Jasna Reed | 3-2 |
| 4. | Simone Yang | 2-3 |
| 5. | Virginia Sung | 1-4 |
| 6. | Lily Yip | 1-4 |
Left: Virginia Sung. Copyright 2001 by Larry Hodges. Right: Lily Yip. Copyright 2001 by Kaus Photography.


Only four of the 58 events at the USA Nationals (not including the ten Disabled events, being run separately) completed on the first day. Results are at the Results page.
The Umpires for the USA Nationals and Team Trials. Photo by Chief Umpire Peter Chamberlain, copyright 2001.

| |
| USA Table Tennis - Serving the Table Tennis Community |
| |