|
11
or 21?By Tyra Parkins
The question asked: “What
do you think of the 11-point rule?”
In starting this questionnaire I had no preconceived
idea as to what anyone would say or how they would vote.
In other words I didn’t seek anyone out who I thought might be for or
against it. I interviewed some of
the “Who’s who in Table Tennis” just as I encountered them randomly at the
U.S. Closed playing site in Las Vegas in December, 2001.
|
|
Cheng Yinghua |
“Fun!!” |
|
|
Simone Yang |
“11 points are okay, but would rather have 5 point change of
serve.” |
|
|
Bohdan J. Dawidowicz |
“Terrible!!” |
|
|
Brian Pace |
“Yes, I like it.
‘Exciting.’ ‘No more down time.’” |
|
|
Sean Lonergan |
“Doesn’t matter.
Indifferent to it.” |
|
|
Danny Seemiller |
“I love it!!” |
|
|
Allison Seibel |
“I like it!” |
|
|
Eric Owens |
“I love it! And it is what the game needs to
be more exciting!” (Before winning Nationals) |
|
|
David Zhuang |
“You must get used to it.” |
|
|
Sean O’Neill |
“I think it’s great.” |
|
|
Nick Mintsiveris |
“It’s okay, I’m getting used to it.” |
|
|
Jasna Reed |
“It is very intense.
There is much more pressure. Anybody
basically can win. It’s
tougher! Better for spectators, but harder for good players.” |
|
|
Howard Grossman |
“Yes, I like it, absolutely.
It’s good for my game. I
like the two serves. It makes me stay focused.” |
|
|
Andre Scott |
“No, I don’t really like it.
Higher-ranked players have a lot more pressure on them now. We have
to come out gunning to stay on top.” |
|
|
Sharlene Krizman-Wilson |
“If I get ahead it’s great.
If not, I don’t like it.” |
|
|
Tim Boggan |
“It really doesn’t matter to me.
All I know is I play a lot more ‘Deuce’ games” |
|
|
Scott Preiss |
“I don’t think there is any advantage for
the better player. But I
don’t know if my opinion counts as I’ve been playing with the 21
points system for 31 years!” |
|
|
Steve Isaacson |
“I feel if I get ahead the game goes
quickly. If the game is going
badly you can get it over quickly then and get on to the next one.” |
|
|
Sol Schiff |
“Totally disapprove.” |
|
|
Barney Reed, Sr. |
“An exciting idea.
Too early to tell.” |
|
|
Allen Barth (referee) |
“Adjustments not only for players, but
umpires as well.” |
|
|
George Brathwaite |
“It’s better from spectators view;
lower-rated players have a better chance going into a game.
Alternating of two serves each also makes it easier and better to
approach a match in a better frame of mind.” |
|
|
Arthur B. Chase |
“It certainly determines the winner
faster.” |
|
|
Marty Reisman |
“Ridiculous.” |
|
|
Scott Gordon |
“Personally I like it, because it’s less
stressful. But, 21 points is better for hardbat.” |
|
|
Steve Berger |
“It stinks!!” |
|
|
Harold Russell |
“No, I don’t like it. Can’t waste any
points; can’t relax.” |
|
|
Jack Howard |
“Terrible. I’m just getting into the game
and it’s over.” |
|
|
Franz Schauer |
“They should go back to 21 points.” |
|
|
Tawny Banh |
“You have to stay focused right from the
start. I’m finally getting used to it; at first it was weird.” |
|
|
Christian Lillieroos |
“I like it. It’s good for the spectators;
it adds drama.” |
|
|
Lily Yip |
“No. Too fast switching the serve; more
pressure.” |
|
|
Shoni Aki |
“It’s very confusing especially for
seniors in doubles.” |
|
|
Dr. Michael Scott |
“A better compromise might be games to 15
points.” |
|
|
Houshang Bozorgzadeh |
“I like it.” |
|
|
Larry Hodges |
“It might be good for the sport – I’m not sure yet. Personally, I hate it, especially alternating serves every two points. And putting all the best of seven or nine scores in the magazine is murder!” |
| |
| USA Table Tennis - Serving the Table Tennis Community |
| |