|
|
|
|
(Larry Hodges) |
|
|
Sorry
about the delay in putting up articles from Saturday night, and no new photos. Bruce Liu's
computer, camcorder, and camera were lost or stolen. All the photos he took
are gone. If
you took any photos during the women's semifinal and final or the men's final
that we could use, please contact Bruce at bay_tt@yahoo.com. |
|
|
MenÕs Singles
Final By Larry Hodges After
all the fireworks of the day as six of the eight quarterfinalists pulled out
of MenÕs Singles, we were left with the Final Two. And it was one heck of a
Final, with an amazing comeback and, perhaps, the youngest National MenÕs
Singles Champion Ever? More on that shortly. The
final was between Samson Dubina (OH, 2476) and 15-year-old Michael Landers
(NY, 2361). Samson made the quarterfinals last year, as well as the USA
National Team. Michael had already made the USA National Junior Team here,
finishing second (top four make the team), and heÕd also won the Youth
Olympic Games Trials. (See article on this elsewhere.) In
game one, Samson gradually built up a lead and won, 11-7, overpowering the
much smaller Michael with his loops. Was this to be a match or, as some might
have thought, a 4-0 wipeout for Samson? Michael answered the question in game
two with a dominant 11-5 win. We have a match! Samson
is a two-winged looper who opens from either wing, but likes to end the point
with his forehand. He has a nice over-the-table backhand loop, especially
returning serve, that often sets up his forehand.
HeÕs also a ferocious counterlooper. Michael plays similar, but probably is
even more forehand oriented, racing all over the court to loop forehands. As
the match wore on, his forehand counter-looping became extremely consistent. Samson
serves into the net to start game three. Down 5-6, he runs off four in a row
to lead 9-6, then itÕs 9-all. He wins the next point on a nice counterloop,
and completely catches Michael with a block to the forehand for a game-ending
ace, 11-9. In
game four, itÕs 4-all, then Samson runs it out, 11-5. HeÕs dominating play
and heÕs up 3-1 in games. He seems to have found a winning strategy of
attacking at wide angles, which takes Michael out of his forehand-dominant
game. What
happens next only Samson knows, but from this perspective, IÕm betting he
began to think about the win that was oh so close. In games five and six,
Michael is playing better and better, and Samson . . . suddenly isnÕt play at
all as he misses over and over as he loses 11-3 and falls behind 8-1 and 9-3
in game six, losing that one 11-6. MichaelÕs counter-looping dominates play,
with the two often going at it from the wide forehand with sidespins that
break the ball even wider. Equally impressive is MichaelÕs ÒweakerÓ side, as
heÕs not missing many backhands either, and loops and hits a number of
backhand winners. His block off SamsonÕs loop is steady and controlling. We
have a seven-gamer—but Samson has shown new life at the end of game
six. He goes up 2-0 . . . and then heÕs down 2-4, 3-4, 3-7! Samson looks
tentative while Michael is playing flawless. And then the tide turned again.
Samson pulls to 7-8. Michael calls a timeout. Then itÕs 7-9, 8-9, then
Michael absolutely rips a forehand and he is serving, up match point, 10-8.
Samson catches Michael off guard with a backhand to the wide forehand that
Michael canÕt return, and itÕs 10-9. And then, Samson blocks MichaelÕs loop
off, and the 15-year-old has pulled off the miracle, -7,5,-9,-5,3,6,9.
And
now the historical perspective. In 1978, 15-year-old Eric Boggan upset Dan
Seemiller to become the youngest player ever to win the USA MenÕs Singles
title. The tournament was held Dec. 16-19, according to his fatherÕs history
books. But online calendars for 1978 show those dates to be Saturday-Tuesday,
rather strange dates for a Nationals. What makes
this important is that Eric was born Aug. 14, 1963, while Michael was born
Aug. 16, 1994. If Eric won his Nationals on Dec. 16—not likely, since
thatÕs the first day of the 1978 Nationals—heÕs still the youngest
ever. If he won it on Dec. 17, the two are tied. If he won it on Dec. 18 or
Dec. 19, then Michael becomes the youngest ever. What date did Eric win it on?
ThatÕs the question weÕll be researching, but if anyone has info, email me at
larry@larrytt.com. At
the start of the match, Michael appeared calm, but appearances can be
deceiving. ÒIn the first game, I could barely see the ball,Ó he said. ÒI was
really nervous, playing this final in front of all these people. I felt like
there was a thousand pound weight on my back. Before we went out, they had a
raffle, and it seemed to go on forever, and I got even more nervous.Ó MichaelÕs
been improving rapidly. His tournament record shows he was basically a 1950
player until a little over two years ago, when, as I helpfully reminded him,
IÕd beaten him (more than once) with a clipboard. (Rematch?) He said that
after a bad loss at the U.S. Open, where he was up 2-0 in games and 5-1 in
the third before losing, he decided to get more serious and began training
much harder. ÒEvery loss since then IÕve learned something.Õ However,
more than anything else, he credits his coach, Ernesto Ebuen, ÒGreatest Coach
Ever!Ó he declared after the match. ÒHis tactics were amazing.Ó Regarding
the controversy of the six players who defaulted in the quarterfinals, he
said, ÒI came here to play. Why didnÕt they bring this up a year ago? But I
wanted to continue; I wanted to win this one for my coach.Ó |
|
|
WomenÕs Singles
Semifinals and Final By Larry Hodges For
the womenÕs semifinals and final, and the menÕs final, Adam Bobrow and Dan
Seemiller kept the crowd entertained on the loudspeaker, with Bobrow often
bringing his comedy routine into play along with various musical choices
between games. The matches were filmed for TV, with Scott Gordon and Ty Hoff
doing the play-by play. Semifinal #1: Gao
Jun vs. Anne Deng When
Gao went up 7-0 and won game one 11-1, it looked like we were in for an
execution. But things change quickly, even after Gao went up 2-0 in game two.
They battled back and forth, with Anne suddenly steady and pulling off winners
with her pips-out forehand, and soon she led 10-9, and then 11-10. Gao pulled
off a nice smash to deuce it, then Anne looped a serve into the net, and itÕs
12-11 Gao. Anne goes on the attack, and forces Gao off the table, where her
pips-out blocking suddenly isnÕt strong—instead Gao is fishing balls
back from off the table! She returns a few, then
suddenly counter-hits a winner, and sheÕs now up 2-0 in games. From
there on, it was pretty much all Gao. In game three, she leads 6-4, wins
11-5. In game four, GaoÕs down 1-3, then she plays a great lobbing
point—yes, Gao can lob with the best!—and
when Anne finally misses, she seems to get careless. Gao wins seven in a row
and wins the game and match, 1,11,5,5. Semifinal #2:
Jasna Rather vs. Ariel Hsing This
looks to be close, a classic match of the experienced two-time Singles
Champion Jasna versus 14-year-old rising (or risen?) star Ariel, who made the
final last year. Both
have tremendous backhands. But
since they both know how strong the otherÕs backhand is, they often played
immediately to the otherÕs forehand. Add that they
often ended the point quickly with their backhand power, and there were few
straight backhand-backhand rallies. Jasna
spins more while Ariel is explosive from both wings with her hitting. Jasna
opens many rallies with slow, spinny loops that Ariel tries to attack. When
Ariel opens with her backhand, itÕs a more driving loop, which she often
follows with her powerful backhand, as does Jasna. In
game one, Ariel leads most of the way, but down 7-9, Jasna ties it 9-all.
Ariel leads 10-9, then wins 12-10. In game two, from 5-all, Ariel runs off
five in a row to lead 10-5, and wins 11-8. In game three, they play close
most of the way, and then Jasna goes up 10-8. But Ariel pulls off two nice
serves that sheÕs been using as a one-two punch in this match: fast into the
backhand, or reverse forehand sidespin short to the forehand, and Jasna
misses both. Jasna shakes it off, and leads 12-11, and wins 14-12 to avoid
going down 0-3 in games. In
game four, Ariel goes up 4-0, then itÕs 7-4, 7-7, 11-7 as she goes up 3-1 in
games. But
Jasna runs away with game five, winning the last four after leading 7-5. Jasna
leads 5-3 in the sixth, but thatÕs when Ariel flicks the ÒonÓ switch, and
goes into overdrive. Eight points later, Ariel has won the match, 10,8,-12,7,-5,5, and is into the final. Final: Gao Jun
vs. Ariel Hsing In
the next-to-last point in the match, Ariel smashed a whole series of balls,
just as she had done in so many other rallies. Gao blocked them all back
until Ariel finally missed. This symbolizes what itÕs like playing Gao. ItÕs
hard enough finding a ball to attack effectively—she gives few changes—but
even when you get the chance, itÕs like banging your head against a brick
wall made of pips. In
game one, from 5-5, Gao wins 11-7. In game two, Gao leads 10-2, wins at . . .
wait a minute, ArielÕs not giving up, gets to 3-4-5-6-7-8, and then 10-9! I
donÕt think anyone in the U.S. has EVER scored eight in a row against Gao,
and now sheÕs in danger of blowing one of the biggest leads possible. And
then Ariel gets the shot, rips a ÒwinnerÓ to GaoÕs wide forehand, and can
only watch as Gao reaches out and blocks a clean winner to ArielÕs wide
forehand. ÒAfter the game,Ó Coach Dennis Davis said later, Òshe came to me
and said, ÔI know what youÕre going to say, I should have killed it to her
middle.ÕÓ Up
2-0 in games, Gao quickly goes up 5-0 in the third, then 9-2, 10-3, 11-5.
Ariel doesnÕt give up, but sheÕs winning most of her points when sheÕs
already down by seven or more points. In
the fourth, down 1-3, Ariel smashes over and over and over, but Gao blocks
them all back, and Ariel jumps in the air in frustration. She ties it up at
5-all, but Gao steps things up and ends it, winning the match at 7,9,5,7. Here
is GaoÕs lifetime record at the USA Nationals: á 9 for 9 in WomenÕs Singles á
9 for 9 in WomenÕs
Doubles á
8 for 8 in Mixed
Doubles á
1 for 1 in Over 40
Women á
27 for 27 overall The
last time I interviewed Gao, sheÕd been taking a break, spending her time at
home watching TV. Now sheÕs out in Los Angeles at the LATTA club, coaching
alongside Tawny Banh and Crystal Huang. ÒIÕm pretty busy now,Ó she said. Gao
had an interesting perspective on the state of U.S. junior girls, having
played three of the four best in the quarters, semis, and final. ÒThey have
improved a lot. When they gain more experience, they will be very good.Ó On
Natalie Sun: she has power, but still needs to choose her shots better. She
had a lot of trouble with my style. On Anne Deng: She needs more power. SheÕs
very quick, but needs to end the point better with her forehand.Ó (Deng has
pips on the forehand.) On Ariel Hsing: She has improved a lot, with good
shots, but needs more experience on choosing the right ball to end the
point.Ó |
|
|
Saturday Events
#2 By Larry Hodges Due
to the many major events on the final day of the Nationals, and in particular
a certain controversy in the quarterfinals of MenÕs Singles that took up
quite some time, I didnÕt get to do as much coverage of other events this
day. However, hereÕs a rundown. (See the results section for complete
results.) MenÕs Doubles The
one-two punch of IndianaÕs duo of Dan SeemillerÕs control play setting up
Mark HazinskiÕs powerful loops overcame WashingtonÕs Fan Yi Yong (and his
powerful backhand loop) and New JerseyÕs Adam Hugh in the final, 6,-8,6,5. In the semifinals, Seemiller/Hazinski defeated
David Zhuang/Shao Yu (NJ/NY), 4,-5,8,9, while
Fan/Hugh defeated Michael Landers/De Tran (NY), 4,8,8. USATT Team Match USATT
made time and table space available for the first ever East vs. West league
match, between the NYTTL of New York City and the BATTF of the Bay Area in
California. (Hopefully someone who was there can write a more extensive
write-up.) Results: BATTF
d. NYTTL, 6-3 1.
Shen
Hailong (BATTF) d. Mauricio Vergara (NYTTL), 3,3,11 2. Li Yu Xiang (NYTTL) d. Anal Kashyap (BATTF), -5,4,-6,6,6 3. Maggie Meng Tian (BATTF) d. Philippe Dassonval (NYTTL),
5,8,6 4. Li Yu Xiang (NYTTL) d. Shen Hailong (BATTF), 10,-5,9,-11,4 5. Maggie Meng Tian (BATTF) d. Mauricio Vergara (NYTTL),
1,1,8 6. Anal Kashyap (BATTF) d. Philippe Dassonval, 3,11,10 7. Maggie Meng Tian (BATTF) d. Li Yu Xiang (NYTTL), 6,-9,6,-8,9 8. Philippe Dassonval (NYTTL) d. Shen Hailong (BATTF), def. 9. Anal Kashyap (BATTF) d. Mauricio Vergara (NYTTL), 4,4,8 Over 30 Shao
Yu (NY) dominated the event, defeating Tri Dinh (CA) in the final, 2,8,6. In
the semifinals, Shao defeated Niraj Oak (TX), 6,107, while Tri defeated
Srinivasan Ramanathan (MI), -5,14,3,10. Over 75 George
Brathwaite (NY) wins the event without losing a game, defeating Fran Suran
(CA) in the semifinals, 6,6,5, and Jack Howard (NV) in the final, 9,10,7. Boys 13 &
Under Charles
Deng (TX) lost a game 11-2 in the first round to Arjun Desai (CA) before
winning at 2,2,-2,4, and doesnÕt lose another game
in the event, winning his next four matches at 3,10,6,5,9,6,7,9,5, and the
final over Ethan Jin (GA), 6,12,9. Ethan Jin won the battle of the Ethans in
the semifinals over Ethan Chua (CA), 7,9,7. Girls 13 &
Under Prachi
Jha (Ca) only lost one game in winning the event, to Erica Tran (CA) in the
semifinals, 8,5,-8,2. In the final, Prachi defeated
Emmy Cheng (CA), 3,5,3. Emmy had a battle in her semis, defeating Tina Wang
(TX), -9,8,-5,7,8. BoysÕ 10 &
Under Top-seeded
Kanak Jha (CA) never had to even go deuce in the event, winning all four of
his matches 3-0. In the final, he defeated Timothy Cheng (IN), 7,7,8. In the semis,
Kanak defeated Newman Cheng (CA), 5,7,7, while Timothy defeated Michael Li
(MD), 9,6,9. Girls 10 &
Under The
semis and final were tightly contested here. In one semifinals, top-seeded
Diane Jiang (CA) defeated Joy Li (TX), 8,3,-9,-9,12.
In the other semifinals, second-seeded Amy Wang (NJ) defeated Hannah Tong
(CA), 9,-13,-7,8,6. In the final, the top seed won,
Diane over Amy, -8,6,13,6. Under 2100 Manuel
Adomo Caraballo (PR) mostly romped in the event, defeating junior Aashay
Patel (CA) in the final, 4,6,2. Aashay may have been a bit tired, as he
struggled through three straight five-gamers to reach the final! Manuel
earlier also won Under 2000. Under 1900 Winning
Under 1800 and Under 3700 Doubles wasnÕt enough for junior Theodore Tran
(CA), who also took Under 1900, though it wasnÕt easy. In the final he
defeated Alan Tanti (CA)—and if thatÕs a familiar name, itÕs because
thatÕs who he defeated in the Under 1800 final and paired up with to win
Under 3700 Doubles. The two practice together at the
Grace Lin club, and the results are impressive. After winning 3-0 last time,
this time Theodore pulled it out at -9,5,11,-7,7.
Alan had an interesting semifinal match against Pierce Scott (OH), 0,-2,-9,5,5! Yes, he wins the first at zero, the loses the next at 2, and goes five games. In the other
semifinals, Theodore defeats Nathaniel Chu (CA), 9,11,-8,9,
so Nathaniel... Under 1700 ...wins Under 1700, over Tharindu Abey (NV), 8,9,10.
Nathaniel barely beat Kevin Wei (CA) in one semifinal, -7,-8,10,11,3,
while Tharindu won over Guo Qi (NJ), 9,-2,8,10, who might have been bit tired
after winning Under 1300 and Under 1400 and making the final of Under 1600. Under 1600/Over
40 Constantin
Papayanopoulos (NY) defeated Mike Sturtevant (CA) in the final, 6,-8,9,5. Under 1200 Seyed
Hamrahian (OH) lost in the Under 1100 final, but he made up for it by winning
here, winning the final in five over Byron White (MI), 7,7,-9,-8,3.
Seyed won his semifinal over Xie Tianming (TX), 5,8,5, while Byron had to battle
to win in his against Tri Huynh (CA), 4,-5,8,-10,10.
Under 1100 Aniket
Matharasi (TX) came from behind to win in the final over Seyed Hamrahian
(OH), -7,-7,7,4,12. Wheelchair Open Stuart
Ronald Caplin, a finalist last year, this time won the event, defeating Pam
Fontaine in the final, 13,-6,9,8. Standing Open In
the final round robin, Samuel Huang came in first at 4-0, with Norman Bass in
second, 3-1. |
|
|
MenÕs Singles
Quarterfinals & Semifinals . . . Sort of By Larry Hodges The
walkout is definitely worth a separate
page. |
|
|
Awards at the
USA Nationals By Larry Hodges After
the womenÕs semifinals, there was an awards ceremony. The award winners were: The NATE
WASSERMAN Memorial Scholarship Award went to eight juniors, with the
results determined from the Junior Single & Team Trials held earlier. The
winners were: Boys: 1st Peter Li,
$1000; 2nd Michael Landers $500; 3rd Alexander Yao
$100; 4th Yahao Zhang $50. Girls: 1st Natalie Sun
$1000; 2nd Ariel Hsing $500; 3rd Lily Zhang $100; 4th
Anne Deng $50. Kagin Lee was given the Excellence in
Umpiring Award. Dan Seemiller was surprised with special
award for his ten years of service as the U.S. MenÕs Coach. Allen Barth was given a special award for
his 22 years as National Tournament Director. The award was a western art
piece by Michael Garman. |
|
|
WomenÕs Singles Quarterfinals By Larry Hodges The
quarterfinals were a clash of four experienced players and four up-and-coming
juniors. ItÕs almost unfortunate, from an aesthetic point of view, that they werenÕt drawn up in all four quarters as
experience versus youth. In
one quarterfinal, Ariel Hsing (CA, 2442, age 14) and Lily Zhang (CA, 2366, age 13) squared
off in a battle of blistering backhands and put-away forehands between junior
practice partners from the Bay Area in California. Many points started with
Lily opening with her strong backhand loop, then Ariel would go after it with
her backhand hitting, and then theyÕd bang it out at speeds far beyond those
of mortal men. (They arenÕt men.) Lily led 9-8 in the first, but lost three
straight points. Arial won game two, 11-7, and Lily returned the favor,
winning game three 11-7. In game four, Lily led 10-9, but Ariel won 13-11. In
the fifth, Ariel led 8-4, then was down 8-9 and 9-10 before winning the game
and match, 9,-7,7,11,10. In
possibly the most interesting quarterfinal, Amy Feng (MD, 2438), the 1992-95 USA
WomenÕs Singles Champion, playing in her first USATT tournament since 2000
(or pretty much any other), took on junior Anne Deng (TX, 2349, age 15). After
lefty Amy won game one, Anne won the next two easily. (Did Anne know who she was playing?) Amy won game four at deuce, got
clobbered by Anne in game five at 3, but took insurmountable leads of 9-2 and
10-6 before (you guessed it) losing the game and match, -6,7,6,-10,3,10. Said Amy, ÒI need to play more tournaments if I
want to play well.Ó The
other two quarterfinals were a bit more straightforward. Gao Jun (MD, 2657) defeated still
another Bay Area California junior, Natalie Sun (CA, 2296, age 13), 6,2,6,6.
Great rallies, but not many can get through the Great Wall of GaoÕs pips-out
penhold blocking. And Jasna Rather (TX, 2407) defeated penholder Diane Chen
(CA, 2297), 9,4,7,4. In
the semifinals, Gao Jun will play Anne Deng, and Jasna Rather will play Ariel
Hsing. |
|
|
Junior Boys and
Girls By Larry Hodges Junior GirlsÕ
Singles & Team Trials Here
are the results of the 2009 USA Junior Girls Singles & Team Trials Final Round Robin,
with the top four making the USA National Junior Team: 1.
Natalie Sun (CA, 2296), 6-1 2.
Ariel Hsing (CA, 2442), 6-1 3.
Lily Zhang (CA, 2366), 5-2 4.
Anne Deng (TX, 2349), 5-2 5.
Erica
Wu (CA, 2186), 3-4 6.
Prachi
Jha (CA, 1939), 2-5 7.
Jasmine
Nguyen (CA, 1837), 1-6 8.
Annie
Guo (NY, 2045), 0-7 Junior BoysÕ
Singles & Team Trials Here
are the results of the 2009 USA Junior Boys Singles & Team Trials Final Round Robin,
with the top four making the USA National Junior Team: 1.
Peter Li (MD, 2456), 7-0 2.
Michael Landers (NY, 2361), 5-2 3.
Alexander Yao (MO, 2306), 5-2 4.
Yahao Zhang (CO, 2421), 5-2 5.
Grant
Li (MA, 2265), 3-4 6.
Marcus
Jackson (MD, 2549), 2-5 7.
Charles
Deng (TX, 2250), 1-6 8.
Brian
Chen (CA, 2081), 0-7 |
|
|
Saturday Events
#1 By Larry Hodges Frank Caliendo
and Samson Dubina Exhibition As
noted yesterday, Frank Caliendo and Samson Dubina played an
exhibition this morning in the main area. Amongst much clowning around, and
with Samson spotting 5 points in game two, and 6 points in the last three
games, Samson won, 3,-5,-8,7,9. ThereÕs no question
FrankÕs a pretty good player, about 1400, with a nice backhand hit. He also
had some nice smashing points against SamsonÕs lobs, though inevitably the
unmissing Samson won those points. Frank
learned to play while growing up in Waukesha, Wisconsin. His dad—a
former minor league baseball player—liked to play, and taught Frank and
his brother, Rico, to play. FrankÕs dad even played regularly at a club with
the Lonergans: Terry, Brian, and future 2550 player Sean Lonergan. Frank said
he hit with Sean at least once, when Sean was about 14. Hardbat Singles Once
again it was Trevor Runyan (CA) winning, and once again without losing a
game. This yearÕs finalist—he seems to play someone different every
time—was Johnard Baldonado, a chopper originally from Germany with a
USATT rating of 2409, to TrevorÕs 2458. In the final, two games were close,
but Trevor won 21-14, 21-19, 21-19. TrevorÕs now won
five straight Hardbat National Championships—three straight Nationals,
two straight U.S. Opens. I donÕt have complete results handy, but as near as
I can tell (and Trevor can remember), he hasnÕt lost a game in the last
three. (Side note—I was at the USATT Coaching Seminar and so missed the
final, and so canÕt give a more extensive report.) Over 60 MenÕs
Singles Jiri Hlava
(MA, 2203) defended his title, defeating David Sakai (MD, 2256) in the final,
-10,7,4,8. Hlava had a scare in the eighths, where he defeated Mark Radom
(MD, 1913) at 11,6,-6,-10,12. |